The suit reads: "If their Logo weren’t enough to conjure FUTURA in the mind of a consumer, Defendants call their new apparel line 'FUTURELIGHT.' In other words, the similarity of the graphic designs and the names is no coincidence: Defendants purposefully invoked Plaintiff in order to suggest an association with him. Although North Face had previously produced apparel in collaboration with him, Defendants made no attempt to obtain authorization from Futura, or even inform Futura, before making extensive use of the infringing logo in a $20 million advertising campaign."
Further, according to the complaint, the FUTURELIGHT trademark "has injured and will continue to injure [Futura] by causing the public to be confused or mistaken into believing that [The North Face]’s goods were designed by, or otherwise affiliated with [Futura]."
香港服务器多少钱一个月?哪家的香港服务器
4核4g6M50G盘20G防御云服务器价格多少钱?T
特发集团与华为签署全面合作协议
【身边的AI】高空抛物智能追溯解决方案,站
中海&华为签署战略深化合作协议
华为赵博:数字化转型成为地产企业最确定的
这款TCL K6V指纹锁不到千元即可买到?大品
凯迪仕指纹锁哪款好用?买凯迪仕指纹锁选哪